I've heard them all before. Maybe you have too. Or maybe you are in this boat even as you read this blog. I am talking about the common objections for why people don't join a local church. They come in various shapes and sizes.

• "I've been burned."
• "They are all a bunch of hypocrites."
• "I can just watch a message on TV Sunday."
• "I read my Bible every day anyway."
• "I still love Christ though I'm not part of a local church."
• "I am not in agreement with their statement of faith."
• "I have certain areas of my life that I'm still working on."

​
Just between us girls, let's be honest with one another. These so called objections are simply nothing more than excuses. They are ways people rationalize not committing to a local body to keep them accountable. This should come as no surprise, especially in the non-committal culture we live in, where church membership is looked at as no more than a club with a view only of  "What can I get out of it". If nothing, then I'm bailing.

So let's address each of these objections. Oops. Typo. I mean excuses.

"I've been burned."
My response to this is, "Who hasn't?" We all have. Therefore, no one should join a church so as not to be burned again, right? And I don't think it a stretch to say that you yourself may have burned others as well. If we never want to be hurt again, then let's lock ourselves in our homes, and never have any contact with the outside world, never mind with people of the church. After all, in today's world, you can do all your work and shopping from the comfort of your home computer. 

This argument is weak than for no other reason that it reveals that this person is a peace-faker, pushing everything under the proverbial rug until one day Mt. Vesuvius explodes. They avoid all conflict because they think that conflict in and of itself is wrong. But biblically, conflict in and of itself is not wrong because it is an opportunity to glorify God through it, to grow in your faith as a result of it, and to serve other people in the process. The key is on how you learn to resolve conflict. The Bible is clear on how.

"If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men"
Romans 12:18, emphasis added

"Therefore if you are presenting your offering at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your offering there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering."
Matthew 5:23-24, emphasis added

In this case, the scenario is not if you have something against your brother, but if your brother has something against you. The fleshly, ungodly and unbiblical knee jerk reaction would be to say, "Well, if so and so has something against me, let them take the initiative and come to me." But the radical teaching that Jesus offers is the only God-honoring response, and that is to realize the onus is on you and for you to take the initiative.

"If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother."
Matthew 18:15, emphasis added

"Be kind to one another, tender-hearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you."
Ephesians 4:32, emphasis added

"See to it that no one comes short of the grace of God; that no root of bitterness springing up causes trouble, and by it many be defiled;"
Hebrews 12:15

​"So then we pursue the things which make for peace and the building up of one another."
Romans 14:19

So this excuse is not so much a commentary on the other people who've burned the person, but more of a commentary on the person and on their unbiblical understanding of conflict and how to reconcile relationships. 

"They are all a bunch of hypocrites."
My response to this is, "How can you see clearly enough to see the hypocrisy and speck that is in other people's eyes, when in the meantime there is a log in your own eye?"

"Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye."
Matthew 7:3-5

"I can just watch a message on T.V. Sunday."
One problem to this excuse is that most teachers on T.V. are false teachers who are propagating the doctrines of demons. Paul warns his son in the faith, pastor Timothy of this.

"But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons."
1 Timothy 4:1, emphasis added

Unfortunately this is not as obvious as it should be because of the major lack in discernment in the church and the high tolerance that permeates our culture and has seeped into the church!

A further problem with this excuse is that you need to be in regular contact with other Christians, in corporate worship and to practice the one another injunctions of the New Testament, i.e. love one another, forgive one another, encourage one another, bear one another's burdens, etc., all of which, by the way, cannot be done looking at your T.V. set.

"I read my Bible every day anyway."
Great. Keep reading. Don't stop. That is your spiritual nourishment. However, you also need to listen to the Bible, with other Christians, from a pastor who is qualified as an expositor of the Scripture. That means the point of his sermon is the point of the sacred text.

"I still love Christ though I'm not part of a local church."​
I've got to be honest and say I have doubts that you love Christ if you're not part of a local church. You see, one who truly loves Christ will love what Christ loves. And Christ loves His Church.

"Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her,"
Ephesians 5:25, emphasis added

So much so that He sacrificed Himself for Her, and this willingly. Furthermore, to say you are committed to Christ is to say you are committed to His Church. You cannot separate the Head from the Body. In his testimony, the apostle Paul said that he persecuted the church( Gal. 1:13; Phil. 1:6), yet Jesus said to him, "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting." (Acts 26:15). How can that be? Because to persecute the Church, the Body, is to persecute the Head, Jesus!

"I am not in agreement with their statement of faith."
Now, if you mean things that relate to...
...the inspiration, inerrancy and sufficiency of Scripture
​...the Trinity,
...the Deity of Christ,
...the substitutionary death of Christ
...the bodily resurrection of Christ
...justification by faith alone in Christ alone,
then I would say you need to sit down with the leadership and discuss these matters. If the church denies any of these critical, essential, non-negotiable doctrines of the Christian faith, then you need to look for another church.

But if you mean that you have a different view of the timeline of end times or the mode of baptism, then I would say join the church as long as you submit to the leadership (Hebrews 13:17) and don't try to draw disciples after you and thus cause division over these matters.

"I have certain areas of my life that I'm still working on."
Don't we all. Your sanctification will not end until one of 2 things happens: you die and are ushered into the presence of the Lord OR the Lord returns. So join a church as an official member with others who are still in the same lifelong process of sanctification.

The Word of God is crystal clear, not pulling any punches.
"and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near."
Hebrews 10:24-25, emphasis added

It is a clear command of Scripture to not forsake assembling together with other believers. And since a command, to disobey is to sin against the One who gave it, namely God Himself.

R.B. Kuiper in his book The Glorious Body of Christ writes,

You've probably heard it before or even said it or thought it yourself: "It isn't loving for God to elect some for salvation but not others. It seems unfair and unjust of God."

Actually, this is a common objection to the doctrine of election, but not a new one. The apostle Paul himself dealt with this objection.

In his magnum opus, the epistle to the Romans, Paul sets forth his thesis, the purpose for why he wrote the book.
​
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, “The righteous shall live by faith."
Romans 1:16-17

There it is. Plainly and clearly. The Gospel. The power of God for salvation. The righteousness of God revealed! 

And as part of this glorious Gospel, Paul, the seasoned theologian,  unfolds the doctrine of election.

"And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that​ God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls: she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”
Romans 9:10-13

Like a hammer driving a nail through a 2 by 4, so Paul drives the divine truth of election to the very center of one's soul. Like a lawyer in a courtroom, his argument is seamlessly woven together by the Scripture. He takes his readers back to the story of their forefather Isaac, how his wife Rebekah had conceived two sons.

Paul highlights two seemingly obvious but deep truths about Jacob and Esau. First, before they were born and second, before they had done nothing, good or bad. Why? Here's a little Greek lesson. It's free. Paul uses what's called the hina clause to introduce the purpose for which he just stated those twin truths...of the twins. And what was it? "In order that God's purpose of election might continue"!

You see, on the one hand, Paul highlights the fact...before they were born...in order to show God's purpose of election. And then on the other hand, Paul highlights the fact...before they had done anything good or bad...in order to show that it is "not because of works but because of Him who calls"!

After unequivocally declaring the truth of divine election, Paul knew that in the mind of his readers they would be thinking of this common yet age old objection.

"What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God's part?"
Romans 9:14, emphasis added
​
And then Paul answers the objection with the strongest Greek negative. "By no means" May it never be. Perish the thought. And once again he goes to the Scripture for support.

"For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills."
Romans 9:15-18, emphasis added

Paul uses Moses and Pharaoh now to illustrate the truth that "it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy." If salvation, after all, depended on human will, none would ever be saved because unbelievers are captured by the devil to do his will. (2 Timothy 2:26 - Paul)

Jesus said:
"You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires."
John 8:44

And the apostle John wrote

"But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.​"
John 1:12, emphasis added

Divine truth demands human response.  The Word of God calls and beckons us to submit. Granted, reading a portion of Scripture like this is a hard pill to swallow. But nonetheless it is Scripture, God's written revelation, His inerrant, infallible, authoritative and sufficient Word. And as such the real question is:

Will you submit to the Word of God?

After his exposition of the divine truth of election, Paul continues his exposition of the Gospel of God.

"For 'everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.' How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have ' never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And  how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?” 17 So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.
Romans 10:13-17, emphasis added

God is holy and perfect, so He cannot, by His own very nature, turn a blind eye to sin. And you, like all others, are sinful and thus stand condemned in the divine courtroom before God, the Judge. You can only have one advocate to defend you. And it's not your religiosity. It's not your good works. It's not your confirmation or your baptism. It's not your priest or your pastor. The only one who can be your Advocate is Jesus Christ. Why? Because He alone lived the perfect, sinless life that God demanded of you. Because He alone willingly went to the cross to pay the penalty for sin and bear the wrath of God. And He alone conquered sin through His resurrection.

Will you call on Him and trust in Him alone to save you?

“The fallen human mind tends to think it is unjust for God to choose some but not everyone – as if we had a right to demand His grace. That’s not fair! is the typical response. But it’s not supposed to be fair. We wouldn’t want it to be fair. “Fair” would mean everyone is eternally condemned.”
-John MacArthur, Ashamed of the Gospel